View Single Post
Old 05-30-2006   #2 (permalink)
Zack Whittaker
Guest


 

Re: AERO Gui Framework

> Questions:
> 1. Is Aero a new GUI framework or not?


Yep - it uses technologies within Vista such as WinFX to render itself...
well it will once the vector Glass comes out. At the moment, it's just put
together with transparent PNG's and a few extra bits and bobs.

> 2. If yes, will it be backward compatible on older versions of Windows
> (i.e. will there be some runtime set of dlls that can be distributed to
> run on XP, etc.)


I'm afraid not ( Glass will only work on Vista and Windows Server
"Longhorn" (but you have to kickstart the Themes service and still have the
minimum hardware)

> 3. Are there any good "official" links on this?

There are a few relating to Glass:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/abo..._092805_2.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...s/default.mspx

--
Zack Whittaker
» ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
» MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
» Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
that up!

--: Original message follows :--
"planaria" <mark@arguslab.com> wrote in message
news:uuOdnVPCscSO9eHZRVn-uw@seanet.com...
>
> We're considering revamping the GUI to a Windows app that was written with
> Win32 (not MFC).
>
> We're considering: Windows Forms, MFC, Qt (from Trolltech), and now Aero.
>
> Have I got this correct? Is Aero a new GUI framework for Vista or simply
> the new laf. Will legacy MFC apps be able to take advantage of the new
> laf?
>
> Questions:
> 1. Is Aero a new GUI framework or not?
>
> 2. If yes, will it be backward compatible on older versions of Windows
> (i.e. will there be some runtime set of dlls that can be distributed to
> run on XP, etc.)
>
> 3. Are there any good "official" links on this?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Mark
> mark_at_arguslab_dot_com
>
>