On 5月27日, 下午6时06分, "nak" <a...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm just wondering why Hardware Assisted Virtualisation is now mandatory?I
> mean tbh, whether it was enabled or disabled in Virtual PC 2007 I didn't
> notice any difference in performance.
>
> Also isn't it a little ironic, a virtualisation technology that's meant to
> cut down the cost of requiring the physical hardware, when actually allotof
> us are going to have to upgrade just so we can make use of the latest
> releases. Wouldn't it have been good if it was an option just like it's
> always been? I've got 2 computers that can't run Virtual PC Beta and oneof
> them is brand spanking new! lol!
>
> Nick.
I experiented somewhat different with the Hardware Virtualization.
The Windows XP running more smooth and speedy when it is turned on but
Windows 98 in the opposite.And some OS can only be installed with it
is turned on (For example the Blue Bottle OS) but some OS can only be
installed with it is turned off (Windows 95/ WindowsNT3.1).