Jeff,
I'm actually leaning more and more towards VMware. VPC '07 is, as you say,
not able to handle usb support, but also there are sound problems. My
machine has onboard sound and with VPC 07 no matter what i tired i can never
get any sound at all. VMware workstation 6.0 beta picks up sound
automatically. I know sound isn't particularly important but, i always have
the opinion that, if the option is there and your pc supports it, then it
should work. It's amazing, really, because, during the early beta tests the
only virtual machine that i could get Vista to work on was VMware server (i
never had much luck with VPC server or VPC), and yet even VMware server
never picked up the sound on my machine. And, in actual fact, i can't
remember any performance issues with VMware server either.
Of course VMware have been in the vitual machine market for quite a while.
VPC, on the other hand, is not a native Microsoft product. If i think
correctly Microsoft bought VPC from Connexant, so Microsoft really haven't
had the ecperience in virtual machines as VMware has.
--
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
Windows Shell/User
Web:
http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web:
http://vistasupport.mvps.org
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
"Jeff" <S.Cerevisiae@duh.edu> wrote in message
news:%23FZJwcmMHHA.780@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> John,
>
> Do you like VMware or VPC '07?
>
> cuz with VPC '07 I don't see those perf hits,
> but no usb support either-like VMware has.
>
> Jeff
>
> "John Barnett MVP" <freelanceit@mvps.org.NOSPAM> wrote in message
> news:OQRSaxlMHHA.1248@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> I've actually tried hiding the Vista partition but found that it didn't
>> work, which was quite disappointing. In the end I reverted to using the
>> bitlocker encryption method. Although i still use the dual boot i have
>> now installed VMware Workstation 6 beta onto Vista and installed a copy
>> of XP onto the Virtual PC.
>> While i do like VMware workstation i am not so keen on the length of time
>> it takes to load its drivers as it does add 15 to 20 seconds to boot up
>> and, until the drivers are actually loaded and the internet activity icon
>> has fully initialised it is difficult to get access to the internet. But
>> VMware Workstation 6 is still in beta so hopefully this delay may be
>> resolved.
>>
>> --
>> John Barnett MVP
>> Associate Expert
>> Windows Shell/User
>>
>> Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
>> Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
>>
>> The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
>> kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
>> reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable
>> for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out
>> of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in
>> this mail/post..
>>
>> "I.P. Nichols" <NoSpan@nada.com> wrote in message
>> news:u4APFIiMHHA.3952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> For certain reasons I have chosen to dual boot XP and Vista and not to
>>> hide the Vista drive so as to prevent XP from removing Vista's system
>>> restore points. Until recently I would manually create a restore point
>>> each time I returned from XP to Vista. Lately I have been using a script
>>> that creates a daily restore point on starting Vista as discussed in
>>> this article. While the article was written for XP, I find it works
>>> equally well in Vista.
>>>
>>> http://windowsxp.mvps.org/checkpoints.htm
>>>
>>> Even if you aren't interested in using the technique, the article has an
>>> good description of when automatic restore checkpoints are created.
>>
>