Symantec is really a "kiss of death"; Norton products, when they were "Peter
Norton" rocked. I still have somewhere "Norton Commander" for DOS and all
the other great software suites made for Win95 etc. Now I would not touch
any Symantec/Norton products for any reason; once you install the Symantec
AV suite you have only one option: format and re-install.
I used Delrina FaxWorks and TalkWorks for years, after Symantec bought it I
had only problems and BSOD.
I really hope that Acronis will not follow the same pattern.
Have a nice day
Stefano C.
"Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
news
2uot2h0asfv3l16csobe328d82igti14v@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:36:26 -0500, "Stefano"
> <Fritzly@nospam.gmail.com> spake thusly:
>
>>Not sure about the pricing but as an user I can confirm that Acronis is
>>way
>>better than Symantec. I use both the workstation and the server edition
>>and
>>there is no comparison.
>>Have a nice day.
>>Stefano C.
>
> Acronis rocks AND it's not Symantec. (yet.....) :-)
> --
> Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
> be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.