JW

They were created on the 10th and after testing were released on the 20th.

"Chris Mattison" <ChrisMattison@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3CABE6B4-E3D6-433E-A5DE-A19670831A84@microsoft.com...
>I did see that last number, but I decided to ignore it, since it still says
> my last drivers were created on the tenth of this month, not the 20th like
> Nvidia says.
>
> "JW" wrote:
>
>> Note that the last number the .65 is the correct number.
>> With differnt versions of Vista drivers both 32 bit and 64bit and many
>> different card/chip types it it appears that the first 3 sets of number
>> idendify the specific drivers for your card. It appears that the 100.
>> number is used to identify an entire family of card and OS specific
>> individual drivers with the same set of software features.
>> "Chris Mattison" <ChrisMattison@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>> message
>> news:83172EF6-028C-4E26-813B-83A7B46E0787@microsoft.com...
>> > Please help...
>> >
>> > I am just minutes away from being classified as a pure noob, so please
>> > forgive me.
>> > I've noticed that with Vista, no matter how many times I update my
>> > Nvidia
>> > graphics drivers, the properties on that piece of hardware in the
>> > device
>> > manager always displays a different display adapter version than what I
>> > just
>> > installed.
>> >
>> > I have a 7800 GT, and my driver version says I've got 7.15.11.65,
>> > though I
>> > know I just installed 100.65 from Nvidia's site, even the date is wrong
>> > saying the driver I just installed is 12 days old. I remember very well
>> > installing current drivers on XP and having them read directly after
>> > the
>> > update the lastest version I installed...but Vista keeps telling me
>> > this
>> > version. For that matter, it tells me that I've got some Window's
>> > version
>> > driver, which until Microsoft devours Nvidia, too, I would like Nvidia
>> > drivers for my Nvidia card.
>> >
>> > What am I doing wrong, or not noticing?
>> >
>> > What am I doing wrong?
>>
>>
>>