Actually, Vista WITH UAC enabled is only as secure as XP. The simple fact
of the matter is that a user can do as much harm to a Vista computer with
UAC as they can with XP. The difference is that you have might have to
clicky a button to do the damage with Vista.
Said it before, and won't stop saying it, clicking a button does NOT make a
system more secure. In fact, in many ways it is far far worse.
"Andre" <Andre@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EC29CF66-1C23-4C80-86A0-A9277A866C2C@microsoft.com...
> So, disabling UAC solved two of the problems I listed before. I still
> haven't
> tested camera transfer because I don't have what to transfer right now.
> But I
> will test it later. As far as making Windows Explorer change the Views on
> all
> folders, well, most of my folders are already in Detailed view, so I can't
> say anything about it.
>
> It seems that program writers need to support UAC better (even Microsoft
> does, the Visual Studio 2005 itself, for instance, has issues). Let's give
> them time. In the meantime I'll leave it disabled. I just hope that Vista
> with UAC disabled is as safe as Windows XP. I never had problems with XP
> and
> I don't want to have any problems with Vista.
>
> Andre
\