You would need to update the GP management tools to GPMC 2.0 for Server 2003
to manage Vista policies on a Server 2003 system. As far as I know there is
no such update yet. Therefore, currently, you need to create and manage the
policies on a Vista system, although they can be distributed by a Server 2003
DC. This doc gives a good overview:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/win...b090dc4fd.mspx
There are extensions for wireless policies that you need to deploy those
from a Server 2003 domain:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/net...ta_ad_ext.mspx
There is also lots of good info on how to deploy GP with Vista at:
http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true
---
Your question may already be answered in Windows Vista Security:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047...otectyourwi-20
"Greg" wrote:
> I have still not ever seen this option "Extra Registry Settings"
> I am running Windows Vista, I have both the gpedit and gpmc running, and I
> don't see it in either place.
> I can enable policies using gpedit and they take effect on my machine, but
> cannot utilize these tools on my win2k3 domain controller. I think I need to
> install the gpmc from Vista on this server? But where do I download it?
> I am really anxious to start working with GP and my Vista workstations, but
> am getting flummoxed!!!
> Thanks,
> Greg
> --
> Greg Gardner
> IT Systems Engineer
>
>
> "Dan Metzler" wrote:
>
> > Has anyone looked at the GPOs created by the Vista Security Guide and found
> > that some settings appear not to have admx template files associated with
> > them?
> >
> > When I view the VSG EC Desktop, Laptop, and Users policies in GPMC on a
> > Vista computer, I see an "Extra Registry Settings" category under
> > Administrative templates. If I expand this category, I see a number of
> > registry settings in the policy which, I assume, there is no way for me to
> > modify since there is no Administrative Template associated with it.
> >
> > Should the Vista Security Guide have come with some Administrative Templates
> > for Vista? Or am I missing something?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Dan Metzler
> >
> >
> >