There is no self evident arguement for that. So you do need to state
reasons.
"cvp" <goawayspammers@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:%23UIQdMHdHHA.4468@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> As I said in an earlier post, I think they should have restricted Vista to
> 64-bit (with a few compatibility enhancements for XP (later).
>
> "philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:u5xtH$GdHHA.5044@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>
>> <.> wrote in message news:%23ATOC5GdHHA.4888@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> But the issue is in the buying. It is not efficient.
>>
>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>
>> I though MS should have concentrated on XP_64 and not even bothered with
>> Vista...
>>
>> Had XP_64 be the new OS...maybe throw in a few enhancements...
>>
>> OTOH: Bill Gates seems to be making a little more money on his job than I
>> am
>> on mine.
>>
>> When I was a kid...I started out at $1.10 an hour...
>>
>> heck I must make two or three times that much today <G>
>>
>>
>