|
Re: GeForce FX5500 vs GeForce FX5200
Media Player is a little, at times, 'jumpy'.
Apart from that, no, not really. But my PC's basics are OLD, hence a PCI
card in the first instance. Vista will probably be the last ne OS on it, and
as I may have trouble getting 'new' PCI-anythings in the future, just
thought I'd get a new card now...
Rgds n tks for response!
"JW" <nospam@no.spam> wrote in message
news:OYDeE02eHHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Many of the current graphics cards are also available as AGP cards. Vista
> and Vista Aero will run with 128MB graphics cards so I don't se any real
> need for you to upgrade for so little performance gain. Is there a
> specific application you are trying to improve the performance of?
>
> "Rod Davies" <ldavies@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message
> news:B4FD854E-184F-452B-87D5-8C258FB8CFC2@microsoft.com...
>>I presently run the FX5200. Aero works fine. Everything (bar the bloody
>>NETWORKING with my wife's XP Pro machine!) works fine. But my FX5200 only
>>has 128MB RAM onboard.
>>
>> Will upgrading to FX5500 with 256 MB onboard RAM make an appreciable
>> difference?
>>
>> Both are, by necessity, 'older' style PCI cards...not PCI Express....old
>> mother of a motherboard!
>>
>> Rgds
>
>
|