|
Re: Why is Vista so buggy?
The difference is probably greater because it takes fewer lines of code to
do the same things in Visual Studio (or you can think of the API's as being
more powerful) today than it did in earlier editions.
"SAM-R" <SAM-R@news.postalias> wrote in message
news:eTfilu%23kGHA.3936@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Also there is something like 50,000,000 lines of code in Vista. That's
> 10,000,000 more lines of code that XP had.
> "Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(remove)@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:uZtvWA8kGHA.2052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> This question keeps appearing in this and other ng's. I found the
>> following to be a very apt description of why bugswatting in Vista is so
>> tough:
>>
>> "Compared to the initial release of Windows XP, the sheer amount of
>> different hardware to be supported, as well as the almost infinite
>> combinations of hardware is proving to be quite a challenge for Microsoft
>> as well as the hardware vendors. One of the biggest hurdles to be faced
>> lies in the fact that it is impossible to find bugs, when certain
>> hardware does not work...."
>>
>> I took it from PROneTworks Vista Newsletter Vol. 1, Issue 55, just
>> released.
>>
>>
>
>
|