Sharon

ROFL ;-) That cracked me up.

"Frank" <fb@nospamm.cmm> wrote in message
news:uTtpkQuhHHA.4520@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Doris Day wrote:
>
>> Actually if one is behind a NAT router, no firewall should be necessary
>> at
>> all. Hmmm, then again, maybe with Windoze, piling condoms on top of
>> condoms
>> is still necessary.
>>
>> Love and Kisses,
>> Doris
>>
>
> Oh Doris...for some reason I actually thought you were smarter than that.
> Mark me disappointed. :-(
> Frank