|
Re: Activation After BIOS Update Bob wrote:
> As I have too much time on my hands I do a lot of guinea pigging ( testing
> for others ) and I have changed many a motherboard and cpu while running both
> XP pro and Vista and this is what I have found based on genuine Intel MoBo's
> not other makes or rebadged boards.
> 1. If you have to replace you MoBo and you do it with the same board you
> don't have to re activate. If you upgrade the board you do naturally.
> 2. You can change your CPU to whatever you want without having to re activate.
> 3. You can add or remove any card or memory without having to re activate.
> 4. I have done numerous BIOS updates without it effecting Windows ( whatever )
> 5. I have also done Intel hardware updates without any effect to activation.
>
> I have found this to be true for both OEM and Original copies of the O/S.
>
> Now I don't know if this answers questions or creates more, but 3 cpu's and
> 5 MoBo's should be enough changes to make this statement.
>
> "Richard Urban" wrote:
>
>> YOU understand wrong. Microsoft never modifies bios code.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Urban
>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>> (For email, remove the obvious from my address)
>>
>> Quote from George Ankner:
>> If you knew as much as you think you know,
>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
>>
>> "Robert Robinson" <robbiex@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>> news:uJCGZ3vkHHA.1624@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> It is my understanding that Microsoft modifies a motherboard's BIOS code
>>> as part of the activation process. I installed a factory recommended BIOS
>>> update and Windows Server 2007 now wants to be re-activated.
>>> Modifying BIOS code is a risky process. Any failure, as from a power
>>> outage, floppy read error or software glitch, can result in an inoperable
>>> BIOS. Correcting this problem requires either a new EEPROM IC or "factory"
>>> re-programming of the existing IC. In the interim, the computer is
>>> completely disabled.
>>> Microsoft's modification of BIOS code is an unwarranted, hazardous
>>> intrusion of customer owned hardware.
>>
Hi Bob and Kerry,
I don't want to drag this out, but do want to emphasize that the only
change that triggered the re-activation was a BIOS update. There were no
other modifications. The hardware were the same dating from the time of
the original, clean install of the OS. |