Thread: Bad Ubuntu
View Single Post
Old 07-13-2007   #25 (permalink)
Mike


 
 

Re: Bad Ubuntu

"Stephan Rose" <nospam@spammer.com> wrote in message
news:lZmdncLHjvo8OQrbnZ2dnUVZ8vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
> Well for one, as alias has stated, doing upgrades is far more painless
> than it is under windows. It comes down to clicking the "Upgrade" button
> and grabbing a cup of coffee while the system goes to do its thing and
> then continuing to use your system like nothing ever happened after a
> quick reboot. It's not like the windows world where in-place upgrades are
> a nightmare and you generally need to wipe the entire machine clean to do
> a reasonable windows upgrade.


But in the "Windows World" you are not forced into this every 3 years.
Besides, most companies don't upgrade OSes on existing machines anyway.
You get the new OS pre-installed on new machines, as needed. On MY
schedule. Makes your "click the Upgrade button and grab a cup of coffee"
seem like an incredible waste of time, particularly when multiplied by 500
(or 5000) machines.

> That said, there are also paid enterprise support packages available from
> Canonical for more support aimed particularly at businesses that I am sure
> will address such concerns as yours.


So you have to pay more in order to get a working solution. I thought
"It's Free" was a major advantage!?

Mike

My System SpecsSystem Spec