|
Re: Bad Ubuntu
Alpha wrote:
> On Jul 13, 8:57 am, Alias <a...@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:
>> Mike wrote:
>>> In article <lZmdncHHjvqqAQrbnZ2dnUVZ8vidn...@giganews.com>,
>>> Stephan Rose <nos...@spammer.com> wrote:
>>>> Here is the release policy:
>>>> LTS Releases are supported for 3 years (5 years server). All other releases
>>>> have 1 year support. When the current LTS expires, a new release is made
>>>> available with LTS support.
>>>> What's so terribly difficult to understand about this?
>>> Nothing actually. What it means is Ubuntu is not something to run a
>>> business on. 3 years?!?! 1 year?!?! Wow, and people complain
>>> about the "MS upgrade treadmill"! MS is still supporting Windows 2000
>>> after 8 years and XP after 6 years.
>>> No business wants OS upgrades forced on them every 3 years in order to
>>> stay supported. If MS did that you would be screaming "monopoly"!
>>> Mike
>> Ubuntu upgrades are totally painless. If you're a business, you back up
>> your data. Installing a new version of Ubuntu is a nice walk in the park
>> compared to Windows which could be likened to taking a walk in South
>> Central LA at 3AM on a Sunday morning.
>>
>> Alias- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Except that, on 10 PCs, it has FAILED to install every time.
>
Bullshˇt
Alias
|