"Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
news:u$PfR0axHHA.1776@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Alpha wrote:
>> On Jul 13, 8:57 am, Alias <a...@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:
>>> Mike wrote:
>>>> In article <lZmdncHHjvqqAQrbnZ2dnUVZ8vidn...@giganews.com>,
>>>> Stephan Rose <nos...@spammer.com> wrote:
>>>>> Here is the release policy:
>>>>> LTS Releases are supported for 3 years (5 years server). All other
>>>>> releases
>>>>> have 1 year support. When the current LTS expires, a new release is
>>>>> made
>>>>> available with LTS support.
>>>>> What's so terribly difficult to understand about this?
>>>> Nothing actually. What it means is Ubuntu is not something to run a
>>>> business on. 3 years?!?! 1 year?!?! Wow, and people complain
>>>> about the "MS upgrade treadmill"! MS is still supporting Windows 2000
>>>> after 8 years and XP after 6 years.
>>>> No business wants OS upgrades forced on them every 3 years in order to
>>>> stay supported. If MS did that you would be screaming "monopoly"!
>>>> Mike
>>> Ubuntu upgrades are totally painless. If you're a business, you back up
>>> your data. Installing a new version of Ubuntu is a nice walk in the park
>>> compared to Windows which could be likened to taking a walk in South
>>> Central LA at 3AM on a Sunday morning.
>>>
>>> Alias- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Except that, on 10 PCs, it has FAILED to install every time.
>>
>
> Bullshˇt
>
Why? I report the truth!
> Alias