|
Re: Bad Ubuntu
Telstar wrote:
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
> news:u$PfR0axHHA.1776@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Alpha wrote:
>>> On Jul 13, 8:57 am, Alias <a...@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:
>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>> In article <lZmdncHHjvqqAQrbnZ2dnUVZ8vidn...@giganews.com>,
>>>>> Stephan Rose <nos...@spammer.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Here is the release policy:
>>>>>> LTS Releases are supported for 3 years (5 years server). All other
>>>>>> releases
>>>>>> have 1 year support. When the current LTS expires, a new release is
>>>>>> made
>>>>>> available with LTS support.
>>>>>> What's so terribly difficult to understand about this?
>>>>> Nothing actually. What it means is Ubuntu is not something to run a
>>>>> business on. 3 years?!?! 1 year?!?! Wow, and people complain
>>>>> about the "MS upgrade treadmill"! MS is still supporting Windows 2000
>>>>> after 8 years and XP after 6 years.
>>>>> No business wants OS upgrades forced on them every 3 years in order to
>>>>> stay supported. If MS did that you would be screaming "monopoly"!
>>>>> Mike
>>>> Ubuntu upgrades are totally painless. If you're a business, you back up
>>>> your data. Installing a new version of Ubuntu is a nice walk in the park
>>>> compared to Windows which could be likened to taking a walk in South
>>>> Central LA at 3AM on a Sunday morning.
>>>>
>>>> Alias- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> Except that, on 10 PCs, it has FAILED to install every time.
>>>
>> Bullshˇt
>>
>
> Why? I report the truth!
>
>> Alias
>
>
Sounds like the CD was dorked. Did you order the CD or burn the
downloaded ISO?
Alias
|