Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:42:21 -0500, "Mark"
> <jmhonzell.nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
>
>>As I've stated, at least 4 times now: Corrupted files are useless.
>>But, in our use of files, we frequently modify, rename, or move files.
>>Each instance creates a new copy of the file and erases the name in the
>>original pointers, but keeps the pointers until actually overwritten when
>>the space is demanded.
>>If not overwritten, the original file can be recovered and there is
>>typically very minimal data loss.
>>
>>Example:
>>In the case of an important family photo, it might be enough to recover the
>>original before the red eyes were fixed. I never stated that the corrupt
>>file could be repaired. But, if the original could be recovered and used,
>>then the red eyes could be fixed again.
>
>
> Little Richie can't be reasoned with. Like all fanboys, once he makes
> up his mind there is no use trying to change it. It further proves the
> vast majority of MVPs posting to THIS newsgroup are little more than
> Microsoft shills. A shame, since there are some respected and very
> knowledgeable MVPs. I guess the good ones avoid this group like the
> plague most of the time so the bad conduct of the knuckleheads that
> hang out here doesn't rub off.
>

Oh, and you're the pot calling the kettle black!
You're nothing but a two-bit, paid to testify loser accountant shill for
a bunch dead beat, blood sucking attorneys.
You're the lowest of the low. You're beneath whale sh*t!
Get lost.
Your last bit of creditability just flew out the Window (pun intended!).
Frank