then what version would be good for the 32bit version (x86)
"peter" <peterk@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:Os$Y2GhoGHA.1140@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> http://www.diskeeper.com/profile/sub...px?a=l&PId=104
>
> pick the business version...unless your using 32bit Vista
> peter
>
> --
> "Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."
> "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23bP0snboGHA.4776@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> wgd schrieb:
>>> In article <9FBA14FC-7371-4639-A404-2B10D89A95C3@microsoft.com>,
>>> Stevenw45@comcast.net says...
>>>> whats the deal with the disk defragmenter?
>>>> i can tell how much of the disk it has defragmented and stuff.
>>>> what the heck did microsoft do to it?
>>>> the way they made it now, you can't even tell which drive its working
>>>> on unless you open up the drive properties and tell it to work on that
>>>> particular disk.
>>>> i'm running a dualboot of xp and vista.
>>>> know which drive is working on and stuff would be nice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I agree. MS has made the defragmenter in Vista a "black box". Use the
>>> free Diskeeper beta for Vista instead. Works better and provides a large
>>> amount of useful information including a graphical display as it
>>> defragments.
>>>
>>> www.diskeeper.com
>>
>> www.diskeeper.com leads to a free trial version, not to a beta for
>> Vista - ?
>>
>> rOy
>
>