I do comprehend more than you know especially by your responses. Such a
shame...
I did mention the proper use of SymNRT. It appears that you haven't
comprehended what I said. Of course prejudice can cause blindness in these
cases. You are no different than the others. Not important enough for me
to waste any more time on.
And I didn't need a "crib sheet" for this. I "rant" in real time.
"Kayman" <kayman~nospam~@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:frtgm9ti9s4c.3oyvnkv14upo.dlg@xxxxxx
Quote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:20:39 -0500, midway wrote:
> Quote:
>> Yes, yes. I have seen your posts in here...
>
> You may have seen it but you didn't comprehend.
> Quote:
>> proclaiming Norton is the source of all evil.
>
> Huh?
> Quote:
>> And it is clear you know nothing of Norton except maybe using it in the
>> past
>> when it was bloatware because you didn't even know how to use SymNRT
>> correctly.
>
> Instead of ranting try to educate us, how about it?
> Quote:
>> And to comment on your "irrelevant drivel"...
>
> You mean to comment on YOUR drivel!
> Quote:
>> ...you are aware that this is a VISTA forum...
>
> Yes, I am.
> Quote:
>> and of course the poster already has Windows Defender.
>
> Good.
> Quote:
>> And I noticed you mentioned NIS breaking XP.
>
> Really, did I?
> Quote:
>> It pretty much tells me you have all this typed down nice and neat and
>> stored
>> somewhere ready to cut and paste it when you see the word "Norton" (or
>> any other
>> AV you don't care for).
>
> Yes and no - "care for" is not the issue; Efficiency is! (Look up the word
> in the dictionary).
> Quote:
>> Go search in other security forums.
>
> No need; The retail version of Norton is a sorry apps.
> Quote:
>> You will notice that other people have had this same problem with
>> SecCenter even
>> with the "irrevelant" AV's you mentioned.
>
> Oh well.
> --