Good suggestions, but I did look at the system requirements printed on the
box before purchasing. It does show that it's *supposed* to be compatible
with Vista. I know, I know. Since I can't use compatibility mode during
installation, it's too late if the install doesn't do what it's supposed to
(i.e. install shortcuts on the start menu) - unless I can do so manually, (as
I did later). During the install, the only option I had was whether to
install a shortcut on the desktop, which I did allow (but it didn't do). I
don't think I've seen many (if any) programs which give you the option of not
having shortcuts placed in the start menu, as I think this would freak out
very many computer users. So that's the story; even though it's academic
(the program seems to work just fine) - any other ideas?

This does bring up a question: The "Games for Windows" banners that we all
see on packaging for newer games; does that imply anything as far as
compatibility?
--
-me.
Let this forum know if this helps or if you figure out the problem, so
others can benefit. As far as I know the "notify me of replies"
does not work, so do not count on this feature.
---------------------------------------
"brink" wrote:
> Hi IKidUnot,
>
> As Andre stated, it most likely is a compatibility issue if the program
> was not designed or certified for Vista. There also may a option during
> setup that you have to select to get the shortcuts.
>
> If the program has was not designed for Vista and has any unusual
> quirks when running, you might consider putting it in Compatibility Mode
> for the OS that it was designed for. I would not worry about unless it
> does. You can see how in this tutorial.
>
> Compatibility Mode
>
> Shawn