View Single Post
Old 05-06-2006   #10 (permalink)
Paul Johnson


 
 

Re: Microsoft limits Vista Firewall - for their own good ?

Puppy Breath wrote:

> "Paul Johnson" <baloo@ursine.ca> wrote in message
> news:35sti3-3ec.ln1@ursine.ca...
>> Please quote inline, top posting is antisocial.
>> http://ursine.ca/Top_Posting

>
> Guess I'm just an antisocial kinda guy. Hate scrolling through something I
> just read two seconds ago.


If you're quoting enough you have to scroll before you see new text, you're
including too much. Your answer indicates you didn't read that website.
The idea of quoting is to give people as much conversational context as
possible for what you're saying. If you're having a hard time spotting new
material, try changing the color of quoted material to green: Any real news
reader can do this.

> In retrospect, I think that whole article is bogus. I doubt enterprises
> made that request and if they did, I doubt it would matter.


I can. Block users from file sharing or connecting to any type of service
the enterprise doesn't consider work-related.

> But I agree
> that giving people the option to use a firewall as a sort of
> after-the-infection-malware-detection tool is probably a good idea.


That's not what any firewall is good for. If Microsoft is trying to
implement packet filtering for this reason, they're probably better
rewriting all that 20+ year old code they keep case-and-pasting into the
next version instead of keeping it and it's bugs around.

> At least from a marketing standpoint is not a practical one.


From a marketing standpoint, a lot of the Right Stuff is utterly impossible
to market since

--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@ursine.ca
Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber
My System SpecsSystem Spec