Trend seems to have added a troublesome feature (email scanning) after
Norton and McAfee did it first.
Most other antivirus companies, if they added such a feature at all, at
least allowed you to leave it disabled, and wrote it so it would not cause
problems if disabled.
Some of the other things you wrote about security are beyond my
knowledge.
"vanilla" <vanilla@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:usi$QGTYIHA.536@xxxxxx
Quote:
> OK ... thanks ... I adopted Vista as soon as it was publicly available at
> the end of last January and have had to try several different commercial
> firewall/antivirus packages to find the right fit for my particular Vista
> config. Over the last five years, I have tried all of the major packages
> ... and during 2007 with Vista, I used four commercial and one free
> solution.
>
> I even considered going the 'no commercial package' route ... Vista
> firewall hardened in Advanced settings, Defender, local group policy ...
> but I don't know enough to make the right decisions ... what the heck is a
> named pipe, anyway? (g) I am working on that ... buying books, reading
> blogs, white papers, studying for exams, etc. ...
>
> So I really hope I will not have to go find something else to try yet
> again ... the replies: receiver address/default address problem needs to
> be fixed, but I am a very patient person and will try
> troubleshooting/workarounds and putting up with _some_ problems while
> waiting for a solution ...
>
> I am wondering, is it just TM that is doing this or are there others, too?
> ... also, what about the advice NOT to use any external filter hooks in
> WinMail ... I have read in more than one newsgroup/blog that says it
> really isn't necessary ...
>
> thanks ... vanilla
>
>
> <robertmiles@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:er0ZviPYIHA.4684@xxxxxx Quote:
>>A recent version of the Trend antivirus program (details not available)
>> causes assorted problems in Windows Mail. Watch to see if the
>> problems get worse enough you need to change your antivirus program.
>>
>> "vanilla" <vanilla@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:Oe9G5pMYIHA.4172@xxxxxx Quote:
>>> That is interesting, as this is happening to me also. Each time I reply
>>> to an e-mail message, I have to check which account is listed as "From"
>>> ... I had not noticed whether the "From" field is always set to the
>>> default account ... don't know about the other poster but, yes, I am
>>> using a third-party spam filter that adds a toolbar in Windows Mail
>>> (Trend Micro Internet Security.)
>>>
>>> I like the program and it is working well for me, so will just live with
>>> paying more attention ... but I _did_ wonder what was going on ...
>>> thanks for info ... vanilla
>>>
>>>
>>> "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:e7qlEsZXIHA.484@xxxxxx
>>>> This problem only happens when something has corrupted or stripped
>>>> the account information from the message you are replying to.
>>>> Are you using any sort of third party anti-spam program?
>>>> Which antivirus are you using?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "strunz" <strunz@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:C34385A6-148B-49C6-B9D6-DCB4F4AFAF54@xxxxxx
>>>>> hi,
>>>>> i have different email accounts with different addresses. when i
>>>>> receive an
>>>>> email and reply, then normally the 'sent to' (my) email address should
>>>>> be
>>>>> automatically selected, shouldn't it? but it doesn`t, it is always my
>>>>> default
>>>>> email address that is used for replies. result: if i am not cautios
>>>>> every
>>>>> time when replying, i send my response with a different email address
>>>>> (my
>>>>> default), which i might not use for this purpose, or which just simply
>>>>> confuses the others. is there a setting which makes it possible to
>>>>> just
>>>>> simply take the specific address, where the email has been sent to by
>>>>> any
>>>>> other person?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> >