02-03-2008
|
#6 (permalink)
|
| Guest |
Re: All just marketing fluff or is it really that good? Dear Turner,
Just you wait.................
Let OneCare update itself and you'll tear your hair out.
Get rid of it now!
AMcF
"Turner Morgan" <tfmorgan@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%233Zst6rZIHA.1168@xxxxxx | Quote: |  | | |
> Richard,
>
> Please forgive the late response.
>
> On other computers I had been using Norton. Going back a bit, to the days
> of DOS and Win3.1, Norton had a good product. Then Symantec got their
> hands on it and it has been going to pot in a hurry! Talk about a system
> hog! Lateley, Symantec seems to have been listening to some of the
> complaints because Norton 360 is not in your face as much as System Works
> but it still hurts system performance.
>
> The other thing is not even Symantec can *completely* remove System Works!
> I tried, first using the Windows Add Remove Programs utility and thinking
> that was it. Wrong! I kept getting dialogs popping up saying the
> Symantec Updater was trying to run but could not find file whatever (I
> can't remember the specifics of the filename). I went to the Symantec web
> presence and discovered the Symantec Removal Tool to get rid of the dregs
> the Add Remove utility had left behind. Even that didn't completly
> cleanse the system. The upshot of all this is, I had to save all my data
> and reformat the HD to FINALLY get rid of all the detritus left over from
> Symantec!
>
> This computer, a homebrew job, will not see Symantec at all. If
> necessary, I shall depend upon the firewall built into the mainboard and
> the one in the router. Right now, I'm using Live OneCare. So far, there
> does not seem to be such a huge performance hit as there was with
> Symantec. However, the firewall blocker gets a bit annoying when you
> first install a new program because, of course, the first thing a new
> program wants to do is "call home" to see if there are any updates and the
> firewall detects this (a good thing, I suppose).
>
> The other pieces of OneCare seem to work OK. Of course, when the
> defragger is running, you are going to see some slow down, but that goes
> away when the defragger finishes (the time required depends upon the size
> of your HD(s) and how much data you have).
>
> Am I satisfied with OneCare? The jury is still out. I can't really
> answer that because I have not been using it long enough.
>
> Regards,
>
> Turner
>
>
> "Richard Thompson" <richard@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:74082739-7632-4DE1-AFF4-1191D6CA6574@xxxxxx | Quote: |  | | |
>> Ok, i've always believed that if something seems too good to be true it
>> generally is too good to be true.
>>
>> After reading about OneCare and trying out the free online web scanner I
>> was pleasantly surprised. I would like to know, from the people out there
>> running Vista with scores of below 4 on their performance rating system,
>> what OneCare does to their systems?
>>
>> Traditionally antivirus has had a major affect on system performance
>> especially when combined with spyware detection, adware detection,
>> firewall, etc. Now that said obviously Microsoft know how their OS works
>> and would have developed something which is good for their OS, but I want
>> to know what the community says AND is it really worth the 38 quid the
>> vendors want for it?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Richard
>>
| | | | | > | | | | | |
My System Specs | |