View Single Post
Old 02-20-2008   #3 (permalink)
On the Bridge


 
 

Re: Windows Messenger versus Windows Live Messenger

>Windows Live Messenger require Windows Messenger to be installed, like
Quote:

>Remote Assistance, Whiteboard, Application Sharing
what about vista, that does have windows messenger, are these features
unavailable???

--
50 Ways to leave your Vista....

CHORUS:

You just format the drive , Clive
Get a New Mac , Jack
Y'don't need that crap toy, Roy
Just get yourself free
Boot from a *nix, Jix
You don't need to discuss much
Install XP, Lee
And get yourself free



"Jonathan Kay [MVP]" <msnewsreplies@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0B3C76BF-5A4B-49E3-86EE-0BCDFCAFCFC2@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Greetings Jelly,
>
> They are separate applications and designed to be both installed. In
> fact, some features within Windows Live Messenger require Windows
> Messenger to be installed, like Remote Assistance, Whiteboard, Application
> Sharing and few other third-party things that make use of the Messenger
> API.
>
> Unless it's specifically bothering you, it is recommended that you leave
> it around.
>
> --
> Jonathan Kay
> Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger
> MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
> MessengerGeek Blog: http://www.messengergeek.com
> Messenger Resources: http://messenger.jonathankay.com
> (c) 2008 Jonathan Kay - If redistributing, you must include this signature
> or citation
> --
>
>
> "Jelly" <Jelly@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:66257593-EDD3-4872-B828-D17CB606BFB6@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> I have both Windows Messenger and Windows Live Messenger programs on my
>> computer.
>> Are they basically the same type of program?
>> If so should I uninstall one of them?
>> If so which one?
>>
>> I have never used Windows Messenger (version 4.7) and don't know how.
>> I have used Windows Live Messenger (latest version) for instant
>> messaging.
>> I suspect that it occasionally freezes up my computer. Maybe because I
>> have
>> both programs installed.
>>
>

My System SpecsSystem Spec