Yes, they all scrape the screen with the same quality as the Vista Snipping
Tool. I want to be able to control the Pixel quality of the scrape or at
least get as good a quality as Windows XP Copy/Paste achieved.
I will answer the second reply here also.
I generate JPG images to view away from home on an Archos DVR when I am
researching my Family - hence PDFs will not get me where I want to go.
"Bob" wrote:
Quote:
> Have you tried any of the free photo editing software?
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=free+photo+editing
>
> "AlanP" <alanpereira@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uH5bQTLdIHA.5984@xxxxxx Quote:
> > In windows XP I used to copy Family Trees out of my FTM Software onto the
> > clipboard & paste them into Microsoft Photo Editor (MPE) to create a JPG
> > image. In Vista the clipboard does not appear to be available to MPE and
> > pasting to Paint generates such a poor quality image as to be unreadable
> > on even one level of zoom from it's original size.
> > Is there any way to improve the quality of the copy / paste images.
> > I've tried the Clipping Tool (slightly better but still not good enough).
> > Some of my Family Trees are only viewable on A3 sized paper, which gives a
> > clue as to what level of zoom I require.
> > I welcome any constructive suggestions on achieving this lost
> > functionality without resorting to a change of the Operating System.
> > Alternative Software?
> > Regedit Patch?
> > Any ideas please?
> > Thanks, AlanP
>
>