I attempted the install until I noticed the build numbers
Used Vista one and didn't like the non visual aspect either. Could take
several minutes or hours. I would also prefer at least visual if we can't use
a 3rd party one.
"Peter" wrote:
> Yes I had hoped that it might work and/or they'd issue an update, but that
> isn't going to happen according to an email I got from them.
> I use DK 10 Pro on my XP's and I can always defrag my Vista partition from
> there.
> The built in one seems to me to be just as slow as XP's and has no visual
> interface to view progress, which makes it worse IMHO.
>
> --
> Peter
> Toronto, Canada
> XP Pro SP2 X 2 + Vista Beta 5536
> "SnoPete" <Pete.Starrett@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:A453AEAB-7ED1-49BF-9547-8B2BBDC131AC@microsoft.com...
> >I think you will find that the Beta version of Diskeeper 10 for Vista was
> >only designed for use with 5381 and 5384 according to Diskeeper's website.
> >
> > Pete
> >
> >
> > "Peter" <Peter@news.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:6A699135-8E58-4AF8-8E98-C4DFFB649AEE@microsoft.com...
> >> It worked fine on 5384 but now wont even install in 5536.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Peter
> >> Toronto, Canada
> >> XP Pro SP2 X 2 + Vista Beta 5536
> >
> >
>