r2rX <r2rX.382ch6@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net> wrote in news:r2rX.382ch6@xxxxxx-
mx.forums.net:
Quote:
>
> UAC and Windows Defender are good ideas, but they're not executed so
> well. And considering that alot of "Internet Security" solutions
> (whether McAfee, Norton, ESET, Kaspersky etc) all have the same/similar
> functionality, why not have that instead?
>
> r2rX 
>
> waste of cpu cycles? I'd rather just not run virusus on my system. Also not
nice to bunch McAfee with Kaspersky, most people will tell you one is not
at all like the other.
Kaspersky
Norton (2008, not <2007)
ESET
McAfee
in that order.
--
-A.