I always have to remind myself that foldershare is free, and therefor there
is really no place for me to complain. However, I would have to add, in the
form of constructive criticism, that I can't fathom why Win2k support was
dropped. I also have a server running Win2k, and though I suppose it could
be upgraded, it makes no sense.
In addition, and I must certainly be wrong, I sure my Win2K foldershare
client worked successfully after the major upgrade, only recently has it
stopped.
Why?
--
Lance Beasley
ENCO Electronic Systems
"Francisco Garcia-Ascanio [MSFT]" wrote:
| Quote: |  | |
|
> Hi,
>
> FolderShare's new OS requirements is:
>
> Windows XP with SP2 or later,
> Windows 2003 Server with SP2 or later, and
> Windows Vista
>
> Best,
> Francisco
>
> --
> Francisco Garcia-Ascanio
> Program Manager
> Windows Live FolderShare
>
> "Michael" <Michael@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:77328B20-8D82-4AB1-8083-62EB7578091A@xxxxxx | Quote: | | | |
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just was forced to install the new version (as we're all) which is ok
> > with
> > me, but now I'm not able to use it at all.
> > Since ages I have an old PC with Win2k as a kind of home server where I
> > just
> > put all my files and stuff like wiki pages, a home mailserver etc. and of
> > course it's my always online pc for my foldershares too. Worked so great
> > so
> > far - until today :-(
> >
> > Am I the only one who's using some older machine exactly for these kinds
> > of
> > services because they're usually more than capable of handling the network
> > requests.
| | | | | > | |
| | |