I never did answer your question did I
Firstly I don't live in earth time, yesterday, today and tomorrow are to me
all one of the same. I unearthed it by using a real NNTP client with a
functioning search feature-
Still working on my WLM/WDS issues - I think I may I have just found the
problem - overload, on me and the search engines - I'd ideally like
everything indexed every which way - I have heaps of disk capacity.
I want to install the penultimate item in what I hope be will prevent any
further infections. So I set all my scanners running this morning - virus
is still going at about 250K objects - I think it will get close to 300K,
Defender which looks inside compressed objects is still going at at 3.6M
objects I think it will get close to 6M objects.
My indexer filters are set up to look everywhere including at the content
objects of compressed objects - ie I'm probably expecting NTFS indexer and
WDS indexer to process several million objects - perhaps that's too much.
What do you reckon - - big ask, hence the dummy spits.
Oh what's an RTM ?
cheers
"Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OKxqp84oIHA.4912@xxxxxx
Quote:
> How did you unearth that ancient post (dated 27 September 2007)? You're
> lucky that the advice still holds, since we've gone through a new build
> and RTM since then. Thanks for the vote of confidence, and good luck with
> the disinfection.
> --
> Noel
>
> "Urbane.Tiger" <phildan@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:IpGdnWmps-X7KZbVnZ2dnUVZ_oesnZ2d@xxxxxx Quote:
>> Noel
>>
>> I am a programmer; there's no reason to store stuff that's application
>> specific in the registry, the only stuff that needs to go in to it are
>> things that other program particular the operation system components
>> (e.g. the info relating to uninstall so in there), At least that's how
>> interpret MS's guidance to developers.
>>
>> I hope it gives you satisfaction to know your posts are still being read
>> and appreciated.
>>
>> I'll be using the process in this thread as part of recovering a
>> seriously infect XP system
>>
> Quote:
>> -------- Original Message -------- Quote:
>>> You're welcome. I can't see the difference, either, why some settings
>>> (eg. accounts) are kept in the file system while others are stored in
>>> the registry, but then, I'm no programmer. But I'd have thought it would
>>> be possible to write all settings to an .ini file in the Store folder,
>>> which could then be written to the registry on start-up. It's also a
>>> pain after a reinstall having to go through all the Options again. Then,
>>> a simple backup of that folder would archive *everything* - accounts,
>>> settings, rules and messages.
> Quote:
Quote:
>>> "Spicester" <spicester@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:e8TUI9RAIHA.4444@xxxxxx
>>> > Thanks Noel.
>>> >
>>> > I'll give that a try. You think they could make an easier option in
>>> > the actual software for that, rather than having to go in to the
>>> > registry.
>>> >
>>> > "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> > news:eTluA4RAIHA.4496@xxxxxx
>>> >> Spicester wrote...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Does anyone know of a way to backup your message rules? It's
>>> >>> frustrating if you do a clean install of WLM to have to create all
>>> >>> your message rules again, especially when you can import your
>>> >>> previous account settings and messages.
>>> >>> Surely there must be an easy way of also importing your previous
>>> >>> message rules.
>>> >>>
>>> >> regedit > HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows Live Mail\Rules, then File
>>> >> >Export.
>
>
>
>