> I don't see any commitment expressed or implied that a Hotmail Plus
| Quote: |  | |
|
> subscription for that $20/yr fee will work indefinitely with any email
> client.
| |
| | |
Actually, they stated quite clearly that the $20/year was necessary to work
with OE.
| Quote: | | |
|
> What you do receive for that exorbitant fee is a doubling of the mail box
> size(10Gb vs 5 for free), no ads from other companies,
| |
| | |
Hmmm.... lets see. I can get a 100gb drive for $200. So 10gb... yes... you
are right. 10gb is worth about $20.
| Quote: | | |
|
> larger file attachments 20Mb per email, and no expiration due to account
> inactivity.
| |
| | |
I should hope they don't expire the account. It was paid for. Suppose you
pay for a year of phone service, and you don't use the phone for 90 days.
Wouldn't you get upset if the phone company shut it down due to inactivity?
| Quote: | | |
|
> One additional feature without a cost increase was added in Sept 2007 but
> also not exclusive to any email client---Pop3 access.
| |
| | |
That's nice if you need pop3. Which I don't.
| Quote: | | |
|
>
> The decision to delay the deprecation of WebDAV access was announced on
> May 5th. Even if WebDav access had been deprecated in June 2008, Pop3
> access to a Hotmail Plus account was not impacted.
| |
| | |
See above
| Quote: | | |
| | |
| | |
I don't care what it says NOW. I care about what it said in the email I
received about a year ago, which said "pay $20 if you want to use OE with
hotmail".
| Quote: | | |
|
>
> Class action based on an expectation without an expressed or implied
> commitment may be
> nothing more than a pipe dream.
| |
| | |
That email seemed pretty "expressed". But forget the class action.
Anyone who paid $20 and uses OE should just go to
https://fortress.wa.gov/atg/formhand...laintForm.aspx
and file an online complaint with the State of Washington Attorney General.
| Quote: | | |
|
>
| |
| | |