On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:51:18 -0600, J_S wrote:
Quote:
> well for the technically inclined, why cant there be a little check box for
> upnp that is checked by default, and then a grey'd out advanced port options
> section for those whom upnp is not an option (ie. those it wont work for,
> and those that don't want to use it. that couldn't be to difficult to code
> into the software, and would give them a feature that is missing in yahoo
> messenger. (suffers from the same lack of port options.)
Giving the user port options only leads to numerous service calls. MSFT and
Yahoo! don't want to do anything which will trigger higher support costs. No
user configurable ports is cheaper in the long run.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum