Vista Forums - View Single Post

**Everlong18** · 08-14-2008

Quote: Originally Posted by Epicurus

That game really suck up so much ressources, its crazy...

I think i have a good gaming rig and thats the only game i cant run at max.

i am playing at high, 1600x1200 with no AA and its playbable with 20 to 30 fps but damn, sometimes its very choppy.... and no way this should happen with a quad core and this 3 months old vid card...

whatever, ill stick to games like Bioshock/CoD4/Lost Planet/Mass effect... very nice games and i can run them with no lag at all with 60fps+ at max.

Boo Crytek!

It's just a badly coded game Crysis 1. Crysis Warhead has the optimized engine and stuff, but it isn't part of the mentioned Crysis trilogy, so that pretty much just makes Crysis 1 a Crytek engine beta game or something.

It does suffer badly from incosistent framerates though.

08-14-2008	#7 (permalink)
Everlong18 <3 Nvidia Join Date: Jul 2008 Windows 7 x64 1,268 posts	Re: Crysis and Nvidia ? Quote: Originally Posted by Epicurus That game really suck up so much ressources, its crazy... I think i have a good gaming rig and thats the only game i cant run at max. i am playing at high, 1600x1200 with no AA and its playbable with 20 to 30 fps but damn, sometimes its very choppy.... and no way this should happen with a quad core and this 3 months old vid card... whatever, ill stick to games like Bioshock/CoD4/Lost Planet/Mass effect... very nice games and i can run them with no lag at all with 60fps+ at max. Boo Crytek! It's just a badly coded game Crysis 1. Crysis Warhead has the optimized engine and stuff, but it isn't part of the mentioned Crysis trilogy, so that pretty much just makes Crysis 1 a Crytek engine beta game or something. It does suffer badly from incosistent framerates though.
My System Specs