I haven't heard of the Turion's causing problems like this but there
is one other big difference between the two PC's, the network adaptor
driver -- make sure you have the latest update for the driver on your
new laptop would be the first thing I'd try.
--
Bob Comer <Microsoft MVP Windows - Virtual Machine>
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:18:01 -0700, Jay
<Jay@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:
>Hi there,
>
>I had a VM working in a Dell (intel cpu), with virtual pc 2004. Host:
>Windows XP SP2.
>All worked fine and the VM could access the internet over NAT.
>
>Then I got a secondary laptop, an Acer with a AMD Turion 64X2 cpu. Host:
>Windows XP Pro SP2 (and later SP3).
>Basically I'm using the same broadband modem to access the Internet and I'm
>using the safe defense mechanism: XP Firewall.
>
>Problem is: when I try to use the VM over the second laptop (the Acer),
>whether I use VPC 2004 or VPC 2007 SP1 (i tried both already, same results),
>I encounter serious problems to access the Internet via NAT.
>When i use the VM on the second laptop, sometimes it loads the web pages
>perfectly, but other times it doesn't load some images or some flash objects.
>Sometimes it doesn't load a page at all, and gives me an error 400.
>However, if I click on refresh, it usually refreshes and loads the page
>(even with some minor problems, like not loading some image inside the page).
>
>My question is: are there any problems with VPC and AMD Turion?
>I have the same Host OS, the same firewall, the same modem, the same virtual
>machine. Only the Host processor is different.
>And I can access the Internet, but I get random errors all the time, when I
>try to load some web pages over IE.
>
>i tried to search on google, on this newsgroup and cannot find anyone else
>complaining about a similar problem. I already tried to run VPC 2004, VPC
>2007, and I always have the same problem on the second laptop. The VM still
>works great on the first laptop (same Host OS, same modem, same way to
>network which is NAT). The only difference I can think about is the Host CPU.
>
>Any hints on this?