It's just as stable, but will potentially have more reboots for patches,
etc. Core is good, I really like it. BUT, it does require that you either be
very comfortable scripting and at the command line, or that you set up a
machine to do the remote management from if you need a gui. For managing
VMs, it's certainly trickier, since there aren't any native command line
tools.
The license for standard is "1+1". You can install the license in the parent
partition, and in one child partition, IF you don't install any roles or
features beyond Hyper-V (and necessary management functionality) in the
Parent. (The same license applies to Server Core, I might add. There is no
difference in licensing between Core versions and full installs.)
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
<christopher@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fad92d71-cd40-4477-9e8d-716da75e8d58@xxxxxx
Quote:
> Thanks Charlie!
>
> So I might be better off installing 2008 std with hyper-v instead?
> Might be alot easier to manage our ISCSI SAN then? As I understand, I
> can install one license of 2008 std twice (one main install, and one
> VM) What do you recomand? Will this be a just as stable setup?
>
> cwb