That is correct as I understand the license, with the usual caveats that
IANAL. And yes, it is easier.
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
<christopher@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4b83a5e1-90d3-4a98-929f-3fe75b42677d@xxxxxx
Quote:
> So if I understand correct:
> Let's say I have one license of 2008 std. I can install the 2008 std
> an just use the hyper-v role nd nothing else, I can then add the same
> OS as a VM on this server running everything I wish without breaking
> the license agreement? In that case, I think I prefer it this way. We
> like scripting and cmd, but I think it will be simpler to just use the
> manager on the server. It will also be alot easier to add virtual disc
> from our ISCSI SAN i guess..
>
> Once again, thank you Charlie. I really appriciate your input!