I am trying to decide on one for Vista - have used the built in but I would
much prefer to see what it is doing. I agree Vista should know which files
are safe to move which I feel I would be comfortable with although I have
always used a 3rd party one with XP, the fact a lot of software is not
working with Vista makes me worry about 3rd party defragmenting software.
I used DK10 with beta2 and it showed the need to defrag even after Vista's own
Installed Perfect Disk with RC1 - crashed on boot defrag each time I never
really worked this one out and the support just told me it happened with
Vista.
I run O&O with XP & have got used to the setup was going to try it with
Vista but don't like the sound of the crashes
I may stay with the Vista built in as this is beta although the lack of
interface is dreadful. AUSLOGIC - new to me until recently but would this be
better than the known names if even their software is not fully compatible
with Vista?
"BillD" wrote:
> I use the bult-in Vista defragmenter because it's very good. It runs in
> background at low I/O priority. I don't find any valid reason to buy another
> product when you already have a very good utility in Vista