Thanks, that helped. The fallback I was speaking of was when the router is
set on WPA2 Mixed, which does support WPA or WPA2. And from what I've seen,
if the client's on WPA2, and for whatever reason that doesn't work (such as
a driver issue or buggy hardware), it will negotiate WPA.
Do you happen to know if there's anything built-in to Vista that shows your
authentication and encryption for the current Wi-Fi connection? Something
like this, from Intel. Ironically, I do have an Intel card, but Intel's
PROset software for Vista is barebones and doesn't include such niceties.
http://www.intel.com/support/wireles.../CS-025744.htm
I know Vista shows such detail for VPN connections, but oddly, not for
Wi-Fi.
I'd also settle for a third-party app that shows it, but if one exists I've
haven't found it yet.
"Jack (MVP-Networking)." <jack@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:#Ewk57RSJHA.1484@xxxxxx
Quote:
> Hi
> Wireless encryption does not work this way.
> If the Router is set to WPA2 all computers that connect Wireless would use
> WPA2 there is No fall back.
> From the weakest to the strongest, Wireless security capacity is.
> No Security
> MAC______(Band Aid if nothing else is available).
> WEP64____(Easy, to "Break" by knowledgeable people).
> WEP128___(A little Harder, but "Hackable" too).
> WPA-PSK__(Very Hard to Break).
> WPA-AES__(Not functionally Breakable)
> WPA2____ (Not functionally Breakable).
> Note 1: WPA-AES the the current entry level rendition of WPA2.
> Note 2: If you use WinXP and did not updated it you would have to download
> the WPA2 patch from Microsoft. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893357
> The documentation of your Wireless devices (Wireless Router, and Wireless
> Computer's Card) should state the type of security that is available with
> your Wireless hardware.
> All devices MUST be set to the same security level using the same pass
> phrase.
> Therefore the security must be set according what ever is the best
> possible of one of the Wireless devices.
> I.e. even if most of your system might be capable to be configured to the
> max. with WPA2, but one device is only capable to be configured to max .
> of WEP, to whole system must be configured to WEP.
> If you need more good security and one device (like a Wireless card that
> can do WEP only) is holding better security for the whole Network, replace
> the device with a better one.
> The Core differences between WEP, WPA, and WPA2 -
> http://www.ezlan.net/wpa_wep.html
> Jack (MVP-Networking).
>
> "Milhouse Van Houten" <btvs@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:eniLIEHSJHA.1148@xxxxxx Quote:
>> In my Vista SP1, I can't seem to find where it shows how my current
>> wireless connection is, well, connected. I expected to see it in the
>> status of the connection in Details, but it wasn't there. Yes, in the
>> network properties of the wireless NIC I can see how it's set, but I
>> don't think that's necessarily how it ultimately connected. For example,
>> if the router is on WPA2 Mixed, it would accept either a WPA or WPA2
>> connection, and if for whatever reason WPA2 couldn't be established, I
>> think it would fall back to WPA.
>