On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:09:02 -0700, ulfire
<ulfire@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Tried it with 32 bit and 64 bit.RC1 wouldn't accept it.Maybe the CD version
>does work as someone said.Unfortunately I bought the download version of
>Nero,so that's no use to me.I only installed RC1 because I had seen in a
>forum that nero and some of my other programs worked with Vista.BTW ,none of
>them do (not properly anyway)Anyway I find RC1 very pretty and very slow .My
>internet connection is also slower with RC1.
>I think I'll wait till RC2000 comes out it may work by then,I certainly
>won't consider buying it on this evidence
>
>"Brian Wescombe" wrote:
>
>> Has anyone tried the new Nero update with RC1 yet?
>>
>>
>>
RC2 has already been released. Too bad you failed to notice the
announcement.
RC2 (build 5744) runs great. Even better than XP did when it went
RTM.
I don't doubt that the RTM of Vista will be even better, since it will
have all the debug code removed. And I don't doubt that Vista will be
released to manufacturing on schedule, in November.
I did try Nero with RC1. It failed to install. Even if I used XP
compatibility mode, as administrator, it failed to install.
Nero is going to have to get on the ball if they want to keep their
hold on the Windows market.
Donald L McDaniel
Please reply to the original thread and newsgroup.
---------------------------------------------------------