![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | sigh.. UI Consistency, please. What's with almost every UI department at Microsoft trying to stand out from the rest..? Internet Explorer, Windows Explorer, MSN/Live Messenger, Office, ..NET applications, regular third-party Win32 applications - they all draw elements at least slightly differently from each other; Tabs, menus, status bars.. ugh I know it's still beta, but with Microsoft there's always been a -very- thin line between Too Early To Tell and No Room For Changes Thanks To Time Constraints. ...so we'd better call this out now, in time for the next Windows, eh? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: sigh.. UI Consistency, please. LOL - they are trying. Whilst I'm not sure how the integration Windows Live products will have on the UI of Vista, I do know for a fact that all the Windows Live stuff are trying to have consistent user interfaces. I see your point though - but probably a bit too late in the development process to be changing things though (-- Zack Whittaker Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor) » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: http://msblog.resdev.net » ZackNET Forum: www.zacknet.co.uk/forum » VistaBase: www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: sigh.. UI Consistency, please. yeah but I still don't get why Microsoft insists in not integrating MSN Messenger with Windows Messenger!!! "Zack Whittaker (R2 Mentor)" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message news:#uk86crKGHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > LOL - they are trying. Whilst I'm not sure how the integration Windows Live > products will have on the UI of Vista, I do know for a fact that all the > Windows Live stuff are trying to have consistent user interfaces. > > I see your point though - but probably a bit too late in the development > process to be changing things though (> > > -- > Zack Whittaker > Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor) > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk > » MSBlog on ResDev: http://msblog.resdev.net > » ZackNET Forum: www.zacknet.co.uk/forum > » VistaBase: www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not > of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one! > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: sigh.. UI Consistency, please. I think Windows Live Messenger (next version of MSN Messenger) will be included with Vista instead of Windows Messenger - don't quote me on that but I'm pretty sure. -- Zack Whittaker Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor) » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » ZackNET Forum: www.zacknet.co.uk/forum » VistaBase: www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: sigh.. UI Consistency, please. Thanks for the information! If that's correct that will, at last, end all the dual-Messenger chaos! P.S. I think it's correct to remove Windows Messenger instead of Windows Live Messenger, since they moved off to Office Communicator for business, and now they can just focus on the consumer side's Windows Live Messenger, and totally getting rid of the middleman Windows Messenger, which, back in 2001, it was included in Windows XP and was advertised as an IM client of choice for business and consumers. If all goes as planned, this will end a lot of grief. "Zack Whittaker (R2 Mentor)" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message news:uGoeZLWLGHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >I think Windows Live Messenger (next version of MSN Messenger) will be >included with Vista instead of Windows Messenger - don't quote me on that >but I'm pretty sure. > > > -- > Zack Whittaker > Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor) > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk > » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org > » ZackNET Forum: www.zacknet.co.uk/forum > » VistaBase: www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and > not > of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one! > |
My System Specs![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| *sigh* nothing but headaches. | Brandnew70x7 | General Discussion | 22 | 07-09-2008 11:51 AM |
| Windows Mail Downloads ENTIRE SERVER Every Time. Sigh... | arclight | Vista mail | 5 | 08-13-2007 08:07 PM |
| UI consistency | aep | Vista General | 0 | 06-28-2006 12:13 AM |
| (Sigh) Compatibility problems... Again | Carlos Manuel Pires | Vista General | 0 | 04-22-2006 06:38 AM |