![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | hardware vector rendering I know that WPF is touted as being hardware accelerated, but from what I have seen so far, it is far from it. It is not at all clear to me how a vector rendering API can be hardware accelerated using 3D hardware which is specialised on blasting textured triangles onto the screen. Can anyone explain to me (i.e. in detail, with links to papers etc) how a latest-gen DX9 graphics card (e.g. an NVidia 7800) can accelerate the drawing of, say, a basic WPF-style button (a box with rounded corners, a gradient of some sort, and a text label). I know my way around the basics of 3D rendering, but it just doesnt seem like a credible claim to me. Looking forward to an explanation. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | RE: hardware vector rendering Charles Loop and Jim Blinn, "Resolution Independent Curve Rendering using Programmable Graphics Hardware". Link at bottom of page http://research.microsoft.com/~cloop/ People are doing all kinds of stuff on shaders - sound and image processing, H.264 decoding, mathematical calculations. It seems very natural to me that the cards should be doing curves as well. "damien.morton@gmail.com" wrote: > I know that WPF is touted as being hardware accelerated, but from what > I have seen so far, it is far from it. > > It is not at all clear to me how a vector rendering API can be hardware > accelerated using 3D hardware which is specialised on blasting textured > triangles onto the screen. > > Can anyone explain to me (i.e. in detail, with links to papers etc) how > a latest-gen DX9 graphics card (e.g. an NVidia 7800) can accelerate the > drawing of, say, a basic WPF-style button (a box with rounded corners, > a gradient of some sort, and a text label). > > I know my way around the basics of 3D rendering, but it just doesnt > seem like a credible claim to me. > > Looking forward to an explanation. > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: hardware vector rendering Thanks for the link - I will enjoy it ! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: hardware vector rendering ...have been wondering that myself...Thanks "Jonas Beckeman" <JonasBeckeman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:FC97C35A-724D-4800-B430-3A15FFCC033E@microsoft.com... > Charles Loop and Jim Blinn, "Resolution Independent Curve Rendering using > Programmable Graphics Hardware". > Link at bottom of page > http://research.microsoft.com/~cloop/ > > People are doing all kinds of stuff on shaders - sound and image > processing, > H.264 decoding, mathematical calculations. It seems very natural to me > that > the cards should be doing curves as well. > > > "damien.morton@gmail.com" wrote: > >> I know that WPF is touted as being hardware accelerated, but from what >> I have seen so far, it is far from it. >> >> It is not at all clear to me how a vector rendering API can be hardware >> accelerated using 3D hardware which is specialised on blasting textured >> triangles onto the screen. >> >> Can anyone explain to me (i.e. in detail, with links to papers etc) how >> a latest-gen DX9 graphics card (e.g. an NVidia 7800) can accelerate the >> drawing of, say, a basic WPF-style button (a box with rounded corners, >> a gradient of some sort, and a text label). >> >> I know my way around the basics of 3D rendering, but it just doesnt >> seem like a credible claim to me. >> >> Looking forward to an explanation. >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| use array or vector | .NET General | |||
| True Vector | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Vista and vector graphics | Vista General | |||