![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | wpf on a 64 bit machine? I am talking with a company who wants to port their code, currently vb6 gui and C++ dlls, to a 64 bit platform. They have done testing with some tool that indicated they could achieve a 20% increase in performance of their graphics intensive app. Since they are starting the port in the next month, does it make sense to stay in .NET 2.0? Even without much experience yet with WPF or .NET3.0, I am inclined to suggest to do this on Vista 64 bit. Can I just install Visual Studio (orcas) on the 64 bit machine and develop as if it were for the most part 32 bit? I know there will be some managed/unmanaged code interop issues but I will hopefully be able to deal with those as I move into the process of communication between the C++ code and the vb.net or c# based presentation layer. I am even wondering if it makes sense to have a WCF layer between the GUI and the C++ dll's. I am writing this question within the Vista Beta2 runtime environment right now. I just got the sound driver installed yesterday. Office 2007and Visual Studio components set up, so I am ready for a new adventure. Thank you, Greg |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: wpf on a 64 bit machine? Is Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Right for Me? White Paper Charlie Russel "hazz" <greghazzard@comcast.net> wrote in message news:4CC9B98A-5977-46AF-BBFB-6EC9AADE1302@microsoft.com... >I am talking with a company who wants to port their code, currently vb6 gui >and C++ dlls, to a 64 bit platform. > They have done testing with some tool that indicated they could achieve a > 20% increase in performance of their graphics intensive app. > Since they are starting the port in the next month, does it make sense to > stay in .NET 2.0? Even without much experience yet with WPF or .NET3.0, I > am inclined to suggest to do this on Vista 64 bit. > Can I just install Visual Studio (orcas) on the 64 bit machine and develop > as if it were for the most part 32 bit? > I know there will be some managed/unmanaged code interop issues but I will > hopefully be able to deal with those as I move into the process of > communication between the C++ code and the vb.net or c# based presentation > layer. > I am even wondering if it makes sense to have a WCF layer between the GUI > and the C++ dll's. > I am writing this question within the Vista Beta2 runtime environment > right now. I just got the sound driver installed yesterday. Office 2007and > Visual Studio components set up, so I am ready for a new adventure. > Thank you, > Greg |
My System Specs![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista Machine unable to print to Printer attached to 98 machine thru parallel port | Network & Sharing | |||
| Booting my XP machine from a mapped drive on my vista machine | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| easy way to transfer applications from XP machine to Vista machine | Vista General | |||
| Importing Outlook 2003 Contacts and Mail from an XP machine to a new Vista machine | Vista mail | |||
| Can't Back Up From Vista Machine to XP Machine Using Vista's Backu | Vista General | |||