![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Same RenderCapability, Different CPU Usage Hi, I have two systems: 1)3.6Ghz P4 with an ATI Radeon x300 2)1Ghz P3 with Nvidia GeForce FX 5500 I am using the more powerful system to develop an application that will use the less powerful system to run it at all times, in a "kiosk" type scenario. Both systems show a RenderCapability of 2. While at idle (there are some background animations) the application shows 0% CPU usage on the powerful system, and 30-40% CPU usage on the less powerful system. My question is: To boost the performance of the less powerful system, would I want to focus my extremely limited student financial resources on a better CPU or on a better graphics card? Since they both have the same RenderCapability, the answer isn't immedietly clear to me. Thanks! Avery |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Same RenderCapability, Different CPU Usage Note that graphics cards with renderCapability 2 range in price from around $70 to over $600, so there is quite a bit of difference in performance/quality, supported resolution, and scalability between them. But don't go buying the most expensive card without doing some profiling first! You didn't say how much memory you have on the systems, that may be useful info as well. One quick test may be to swap the graphics cards between the machines if possible (although perhaps the 5500 is AGP and the x300 is PCIe, right?). If the slow machine gets better, then you may have your answer... Let me check and see what other folks think about this one. -Pablo "Avery Z" <AveryZ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4F5D4BA3-D162-4EDD-9FDE-7C961C5E4CFF@microsoft.com... > Hi, > > I have two systems: > 1)3.6Ghz P4 with an ATI Radeon x300 > 2)1Ghz P3 with Nvidia GeForce FX 5500 > > I am using the more powerful system to develop an application that will > use > the less powerful system to run it at all times, in a "kiosk" type > scenario. > Both systems show a RenderCapability of 2. > > While at idle (there are some background animations) the application shows > 0% CPU usage on the powerful system, and 30-40% CPU usage on the less > powerful system. My question is: To boost the performance of the less > powerful system, would I want to focus my extremely limited student > financial > resources on a better CPU or on a better graphics card? Since they both > have > the same RenderCapability, the answer isn't immedietly clear to me. > > Thanks! > Avery |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CPU Usage | The Toastmaster | Vista mail | 2 | 04-29-2008 07:31 AM |
| Re: 100% CPU usage | Jose Rocaspana | Live Messenger | 1 | 11-18-2007 06:08 AM |
| 100% CPU USAGE - HELP ! | Vista Explorer | Vista performance & maintenance | 1 | 01-18-2007 12:21 PM |
| NET 3 Usage? | Flowering Weeds | PowerShell | 7 | 11-08-2006 04:11 PM |
| RenderCapability::Tier returns 131072? | John Dunn | Avalon | 5 | 06-28-2006 11:07 PM |