![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| | |||||||
| | Vista - Bad 3D render performance of WPF in XP |
| |
| 07-19-2007 | #1 |
| | Bad 3D render performance of WPF in XP I have created a 3D model in blend, and it could work well and animation is smooth in Vista, but in XP, the 3D model's animation is jerky and the performance looks bad. BTW, I tested it in the same machine. Any expert has any idea? Thanks. -- Impossible Mission |
| My System Specs |
| 07-19-2007 | #2 |
| | Re: Bad 3D render performance of WPF in XP I think fancy 3D stuff is software rendered on XP (even if the hardware - video card has 3D acceleration), while Vista will use the hardware. "little insect" <littleinsect@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F4E85920-A845-46C9-8A7F-19C49C1352EF@microsoft.com... >I have created a 3D model in blend, and it could work well and animation is > smooth in Vista, but in XP, the 3D model's animation is jerky and the > performance looks bad. BTW, I tested it in the same machine. > > Any expert has any idea? > > Thanks. > -- > Impossible Mission |
| My System Specs |
| 07-19-2007 | #3 |
| | Re: Bad 3D render performance of WPF in XP Is there any method or workaround to solve this issue? Thanks -- Impossible Mission "Radek Cerny" wrote: > I think fancy 3D stuff is software rendered on XP (even if the hardware - > video card has 3D acceleration), while Vista will use the hardware. > > "little insect" <littleinsect@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:F4E85920-A845-46C9-8A7F-19C49C1352EF@microsoft.com... > >I have created a 3D model in blend, and it could work well and animation is > > smooth in Vista, but in XP, the 3D model's animation is jerky and the > > performance looks bad. BTW, I tested it in the same machine. > > > > Any expert has any idea? > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > Impossible Mission > > > |
| My System Specs |
| 07-21-2007 | #4 |
| | Re: Bad 3D render performance of WPF in XP If your window is not rectangular, make it so, as non rectangular WPF windows on XP are not accelerated (or very poorly). For your 3D objects, there's not much you can do except embed some "true" Direct3D inside your app, or wait for the next version of WPF which (might) solve the performance issue. On Jul 19, 4:56 pm, little insect <littleins...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > Is there any method or workaround to solve this issue? > > Thanks > -- > Impossible Mission > > > > "Radek Cerny" wrote: > > I think fancy 3D stuff is software rendered on XP (even if the hardware - > > video card has 3D acceleration), while Vista will use the hardware. > > > "little insect" <littleins...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >news:F4E85920-A845-46C9-8A7F-19C49C1352EF@microsoft.com... > > >I have created a 3D model in blend, and it could work well and animation is > > > smooth in Vista, but in XP, the 3D model's animation is jerky and the > > > performance looks bad. BTW, I tested it in the same machine. > > > > Any expert has any idea? > > > > Thanks. > > > -- > > > Impossible Mission- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |
| My System Specs |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| Similar Threads for: Bad 3D render performance of WPF in XP | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| AMD Fusion Render Cloud | Vista News | |||
| render xml page | .NET General | |||
| Help please! Graph render fail | Vista music pictures video | |||