So what do you think is better 32-Bit or 64-Bit? If you could Please Vote and Post a Reason Why that will be Greatly appreciated.
Me personally I prefer 32-Bit because a Lot of 64-Bit Computers have Drivers and Hardware Problems
Many Thanks,
Josh



So what do you think is better 32-Bit or 64-Bit? If you could Please Vote and Post a Reason Why that will be Greatly appreciated.
Me personally I prefer 32-Bit because a Lot of 64-Bit Computers have Drivers and Hardware Problems
Many Thanks,
Josh
I can use all of my RAM on 64bit, one gets less problems with large numbers (numbers can be larger) and it is the future!
This isn't true anymore... Originally there weren't alot of support, but now everything has 64bit support.
Now too, with the cost of RAM not bad, 4Gigs is the only way to go.
Another reason 64bits "better" is video cards. Befoere i had switched over to 64bit, XP lost about a gig of ram due to my 2 gtx 260s and the gig and ahalf of combined ram.
64bit doesn't "steal" the system ram.



Especially when Vista first came out a lot of 64-bit computers had BSOD because of Drivers
^But thats like saying the model T blows because its slower than a Lambo...
Alot of BSODs came from Vista and its redesign, not from the 32/64 bit thing.



I believe that a lot of BSOD were from 64-Bit Versions for example if you check the Crashes and Debugging Forum you will find that about 75% of Cases are with 64-Bit computers![]()
But I also think that most of the problems were not BSoDs, but devices simply not working.



Fair Point in fact on my 32-Bit laptop All the BSOD were Devices not working and corrupted drivers