
Originally Posted by
theshoe82
Hmmm, interesting. The XFX mobo has a built in overclocking feature, it seems to overclock as a default. I think this is the case because the 5400+ black edition processor I have is rated for 2.8 Ghz, and according to my system stats it is running at 3.21 Ghz.
When an individual chooses to overclock hardware which they have purchased, that's their right. Personally, I think overclocking is misguided, but it's well within the law for someone to do whatever they want to their property, including putting an axe through it should such a thing strike their fancy. However, when a system builder overclocks and then
misrepresents the hardware specifications of the computers they're selling, that's illegal. If I'd bought hardware based on advertising material which claimed a 3.21GHz processor, only to find an overclocked 2.8GHz unit, I'd personally be pretty POed.
That unscrupulous practice started the day someone found they could sell an XT clone with an 8088 normally clocked at 4.77MHz as a 6MHz "turbo" unit by replacing the crystal on the moterboard with a faster one for $0.99 from Tandy. In the early 90s, dodgy system assemblers were routinely being found "lapping" their processors to shave off the text on the housing, so that it could be sold as a faster unit (when overclocked of course).
I don't know your circumstances, but if you feel you were somehow duped into buying an overclocked computer, I'd suggest complaining in the strongest terms. There's no telling what other corners were cut in putting together that machine.

Originally Posted by
theshoe82
What steps do you fellows think I should follow next in trying to determine the exact issue?
Thanks again for all the help, by the way!
One way or the other, the overclocked configuration should be wound back to "within specs" operation. I don't think it's a good use of your time to continue to seek other answers while the machine remains overclocked.