![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Vista Home Premium SP1 32-bit | Re: Joomla & Vista dmex, Okay, turning off UAC slows down boot time. That's a lot different than slowing down Vista performance. Where is there any documentation from anyone that shows it slows down Vista after it has booted? S- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Windows Vista™ Ultimate | Re: Joomla & Vista ![]() Quote: Find out for yourself, just look at the Performance Log boot times with UAC enabled over a few days then do the same with it turned off and compare the average boot time...You will find it boots faster with UAC enabled. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Vista Home Premium SP1 32-bit | Re: Joomla & Vista dmex, Wow. Did you even read my question?? Slowing down boot up time is a lot different than slowing down Vista performance. Where is there any documentation from anyone that shows it slows down Vista after it has booted? S- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Windows Vista™ Ultimate | Re: Joomla & Vista I did and why do I have to repeat myself? ![]() If you check your Operational Log, do your math and calculate the average time with and without UAC for boottimes and applications than you will have your answer...I dont know what documentation you want because that average will not apply to every VistaPC since each one has different hardware and software configurations but there is a noticeable difference in the results for application and bootime performance. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Vista Home Premium SP1 32-bit | Re: Joomla & Vista I did and why do I have to repeat myself? ![]() If you check your Operational Log, do your math and calculate the average time with and without UAC for boottimes and applications than you will have your answer...I dont know what documentation you want because that average will not apply to every VistaPC since each one has different hardware and software configurations but there is a noticeable difference in the results for application and bootime performance. You keep repeating the same stuff about boot times and that does not answer my question. All that you have shown is that boot time is slower with UAC disabled. The link you provided discusses boot times only. There is nothing about Vista performance after the boot process is finished and that is what I am asking about. The Event Viewer log on two different system shows nothing about applications taking longer to start up. I can find nothing on the Internet about these delays with UAC off either. You would think someone would be talking about them. S- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Vista Home Premium SP1 32-bit | Re: Joomla & Vista dmex, Look at this document from Microsoft: http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...Vista_perf.doc When doing performance testing, Microsoft recommends leaving UAC enabled but set to "Elevate without Prompting". So that kills the idea that leaving UAC enabled but set to "Elevate without Prompting" will affect performance. I still can't find anything that says turning off UAC causes any performance issues other than a slower boot time (big whoop!). Do you have anything??? S- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Windows Vista™ Ultimate | Re: Joomla & Vista So that kills the idea that leaving UAC enabled but set to "Elevate without Prompting" will affect performance. I still can't find anything that says turning off UAC causes any performance issues other than a slower boot time (big whoop!). Do you have anything??? S- Do you know what virtualization actually does to x86 code on x64? It reorders all instruction sets (basically the whole program) and this does cause performance issues on x64 if the application is not coded correctly. The code im using for a soon-to-be-released utility does have issues with execution time and do vary depending on both UAC and the virtualalized driver being enabled on systems. If I tried to minimize the number of locks taken out to guard the consistency of data structures accessible from multiple threads it causes the execution time to vary from instant to 10 minutes...the x86 memory model provided a level of safety by guaranteeing that all write operations occurred in order and on time. This guarantee does not happen with 64-bit because it explicitly requires it before accessing the 64bit instruction altogether and while this is good for end-users...It gets worse (for poorly written applications) when virtualization gets involved and code that reads data without the protections of locks can experience unexpected results caused by the processor reordering instructions (virtualization) and the potential for unexpected code execution results arises. Now this isnt a problem for end-users since developers refine the code untill its executing timely and properly without variable results but it does cause me headaches trying to code directly for x64 systems with virtualization envolved. ---Facts aside--- If you want me to prove how virtualization makes applications slower go try running a few resource-hungry programs in a virtual machine, thats the only way you will see first hand how virtualization slows performance down without building your own application. I also dont want to continually argue the point of UAC being disabled makes application performance & execution time longer, I know it does from first hand experience coding applications myself...So Im pulling rank and thread closed |
My System Specs![]() |