|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
 |
| |
02-27-2009
| #41 (permalink) |
| ATI\AMD <3 Jesus..<3 | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification  Quote: Originally Posted by Everlong18  Quote: Originally Posted by Vista_32bit Quote: Originally Posted by Everlong18 The 295 can out perform a 285 and 280, and in a lot of cases can also out perform a 4870x2 as well.  I stick to my order. i will reject your reality and substitute my own  haha |
My System Specs |
|
02-27-2009
| #42 (permalink) |
| PC Geek | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification Quote: Originally Posted by thepizzaman Quote: Originally Posted by Everlong18 Quote: Originally Posted by Vista_32bit The specs differ quite a bit. The 295 has the lowest core clock at 576MHz that is equivalent to the 8400GS. The 280 at 604MHz, 285 at 648MHz, and the 4870 X2 at 750MHz. The winner is clear I stick to my order. i will reject your reality and substitute my own haha |
| My System Specs |
|
02-28-2009
| #43 (permalink) |
| im coming for cake | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification Quote: Originally Posted by Vista_32bit The 295 has the lowest core clock at 576MHz that is equivalent to the 8400GS. The 280 at 604MHz, 285 at 648MHz, and the 4870 X2 at 750MHz. The winner is clear I stick to my order.  how dare you use the terms....8400GS & GTX295, in the same sentence  just B/C the 295 has a lower clock speed MEANS NOTHING.. GTX295 = A combined 480SPs, on a combined 896bit bus (the largest on the planet) not too mention the 2x GT200 cores & the 1792mb VRAM... GTX285 = 240SPs, on a 512bit bus, 1024mb VRAM (great card, but the 295 surpasses it) HD4870x2 = 1600SPs, 2gb DDR5, on a combined 512bit bus, 2x 4870 cores (super performer, but still not as powerful as the 295) 8400GS = 450mhz core, 256mb DDR2 @ 800mhz (lol) & god knows how many SPs (this card is CRAP & has no place with whats listed above)when i see a GTX285 out perform a GTX295, then i shall bump it up the list.... SK |
| My System Specs |
|
02-28-2009
| #44 (permalink) |
| ATI\AMD <3 Jesus..<3 | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification Quote: Originally Posted by MrNeeds Quote: Originally Posted by thepizzaman Quote: Originally Posted by Everlong18 Clock speeds aren't everything though, and you don't buy a 295 to run it without SLI enabled, so having it run in SLI is going to out perform a 280 and 285, and will infact out perform a 4870x2 regardless of clock speeds. i will reject your reality and substitute my own haha |
| My System Specs |
|
03-07-2009
| #45 (permalink) |
| Member | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification Quote: GTX295 HD4870X2 GTX285 GTX 280 GTX265 GTX 260 216 HD4870 1GB GTX 260 9800GX2 (G92) HD4870 9800GTX+ HD4850 9800GTX (G92) 8800 ULTRA (G80) HD3870X2 8800GTX (G80) 8800GTS ...(G92) HD4830 9800GT ....(G92) 8800GT ...(G92) HD3870 HD4670 9600GT ...(G92) HD2900XT HD2900PRO 8800GTS (G80) 8800GS(G80) 8800GTS 320MB GTX 295 HD 4870 X2 GTX 285 GTX 280 *HD 4850 X2 GTX 260 CORE 216 55nm GTX 260 CORE 216 HD 4870 1 GB HD 4870 512 MB GTX 260 9800GX2 (iffy, it can be above this spot too) *GTS 250 1 GB *9800GTX+ 1 GB *HD 4850 2 GB *GTS 250 9800GTX+ HD 4850 9800GTX HD 3870 X2 8800 Ultra 8800GTX 8800GTS G92 *GTS 240 1 GB *9800GT 1 GB *8800GT 1 GB *GTS 240 9800GT 8800GT HD 4830 *8800GTS (640 MB 112 stream processing cores) 8800GTS 640 HD 3870 *GTS 230 9600GT 8800GT 256 (it can be above the GTS 230 in some cases) 8800GTS 320 (it can be above the GTS 230 in some cases) *9600GSO 768 MB *8800GS 768 MB *9600GSO 8800GS * = Either left out or very close to release |
| My System Specs |
|
03-07-2009
| #46 (permalink) |
| <3 Nvidia | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification The 8800 Ultra should be above the GTS250. |
| My System Specs |
|
03-07-2009
| #47 (permalink) |
| Member | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification The GTS 250 is a 9800GTX+, which typically outperforms an 8800 Ultra unless you're running high resolutions (above 1680 x 1050). The extra transistors and faster clock speeds help out a lot. |
| My System Specs |
|
03-07-2009
| #48 (permalink) |
| <3 Nvidia | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification An 8800 Ultra has more RAM and a higher memory interface with the same amount of shaders. If it can out perform my 8800GTS 512, it can outpeform a 9800GTX+ and most likely a GTS250. If a 9800GTX/GTS250 does outperform it in anything, the difference won't be massive. |
| My System Specs |
|
03-07-2009
| #49 (permalink) |
| Member | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification |
| My System Specs |
|
03-07-2009
| #50 (permalink) |
| <3 Nvidia | Re: Graphics Card Performance and Classification Quote: Originally Posted by boredgunner And I did say, if the 9800GTX out performs the Ultra in anything, the difference won't be massive, and the most it is on there is like 4 or 5 fps. I might overestimate the Ultra against the GTS 250 though, as it should run more efficiently, so perform better. Last edited by Everlong18; 03-07-2009 at 07:31 PM.. |
| My System Specs |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| how do you make your graphics card better performance | Graphic cards | |||
| Graphics Performance (CSS) | Vista General | |||
| Minimum graphics card to get graphics WEIs of 3.0? 5.9? | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Performance gains with a high end graphics card | Vista General | |||
| Why is Vista 2D Graphics & Text performance so bad compared to XP? | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
