![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Vista Ultimate x64 | GTS 250 vs GTS 240 Just wondering how much of a performance difference I would notice between these two cards? GTS 240 (OEM): GPU Engine Specs: Processor Cores 112 Graphics Clock (MHz) 675 MHz Processor Clock (MHz) 1620 MHz Texture Fill Rate (billion/sec) 37.8 Memory Specs: Memory Clock (MHz) 1100 MHz Standard Memory Config 1 GB GDDR3 Memory Interface Width 256-bit Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) 70.4 GTS 250: GPU Engine Specs: Processor Cores 128 Graphics Clock (MHz) 738 MHz Processor Clock (MHz) 1836 MHz Texture Fill Rate (billion/sec) 47.2 Memory Specs: Memory Clock (MHz) 1100 MHz Standard Memory Config 512MB Memory Interface Width 256-bit Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) 70.4 The reason I ask, boils down to $$. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Vista Ultimate x64 | Re: GTS 250 vs GTS 240 The GTS 240 is pretty much a renamed 9800 GT/GTX (specs are a mix of the two), with the GTS 250 basically a renamed 9800 GTX+. Some of the reviews here should help, Video Card Comparison - GPUReview.com just shave a few FPS off of any of the 9800 GTX numbers, and it should be in the ballpark for what the GTS 240 can do. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Vista Home Premium 64bit SP2 | Re: GTS 250 vs GTS 240 |
My System Specs![]() |