![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Questions on DataContract Hi - a couple of basic questions: (1) if I have a custom class as a parameter to an OperationContract method, does that class need to be a DataContract class? (2) do the DataMembers of a DataContract always have to have a "get" and a "set"? Thanks, Peter |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Vista Ultimate x64 | Re: Questions on DataContract Hi! 1) As far as I understand it the classes you expose must be at least serializeable, but the datacontract attribute makes it easy to change the contract later in a compatible way. Alex |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Questions on DataContract 1) Custom defined types must have the DataContract attribute. Alternatively, if you can use MessageContracts. 2) No. They can even be private, protected, or public members but without having equivalent property declarations. -- Best regards, Cezary Nolewajka Consultant | Microsoft Services | Microsoft | Poland "Peter K" <xdzgor@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u$6yMYCXIHA.4440@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi - a couple of basic questions: > > (1) > if I have a custom class as a parameter to an OperationContract method, > does that class need to be a DataContract class? > > (2) > do the DataMembers of a DataContract always have to have a "get" and a > "set"? > > > Thanks, > Peter |
My System Specs![]() |