Vista - Which should I choose to develop an application like ICQ?

so many channels there that I am confused to choose one.
Help me?

Hello cnSoftware,

BasicHttpBinding is probably your sest best for messanger like application.

HTH,

Juval Lowy, IDesign Inc.

> so many channels there that I am confused to choose one. Help me?
>

Hi,

WCF provides a lot of channel bindings that work on different form. You can
use each one of they as you need.

{from Windows Vista Documentation}

basicHttpBinding element
A binding that is suitable for talking to WS-Basic Profile conformant Web
Services, for example, ASMX-based services. This binding uses HTTP as the
transport and Text/XML as the message encoding.

wsHttpBinding element
A secure, reliable, interoperable binding that is suitable for non-duplex
service contracts.

wsDualHttpBinding element
A secure, reliable, interoperable binding that is suitable for duplex
service contracts or communication through SOAP intermediaries.

netTcpBinding element
A secure, reliable, optimized binding suitable for cross-machine
communication.

netNamedPipeBinding element
A secure, reliable, optimized binding that is suitable for on-machine
communication.

netMsmqBinding element
A queued binding that is suitable for cross-machine communication between
WCF applications.

msmqIntegrationBinding element
A binding that is suitable for cross-machine communication with existing
MSMQ applications.

wsFederationBinding Element
A binding that enables organizations that are in a federation to
efficiently authenticate and authorize users.

More information:
http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com...7126a579a6.asp

Regards,

--
Ronald Ricardo Ramirez Moran
Solutions Architect
DlanorOk Solutions, INC.

Blog:
http://spaces.msn.com/DlanorOk {spanish}
http://blogs.wdevs.com/DlanorOk


"Juval Lowy" wrote:

> Hello cnSoftware,
>
> BasicHttpBinding is probably your sest best for messanger like application.
>
> HTH,
>
> Juval Lowy, IDesign Inc.
>
> > so many channels there that I am confused to choose one. Help me?
> >
>
>
>